Fux0red Part(i forgot how many i've been in already)
well lets see, how screwy was my day? supposed to go to work, but overslept and ended up MIAing at home again. rachel's finally back in sg, talked to her last nite, missed her so much, but that wat i'm feeling now. i'm feeling severely annoyed, pissed and frustrated. not just at 1 person. here, jacqueline was supposed to go to dbs hq and collect money to return to me. but she's still stuck in hospital. way to go jacq. promised since wed, but due to unfortunate circumstances she has had an asthma attack and is now in the hospital.well i'm trying my best not to sound cold and heartless, but i dun care really,i just want my money back.pls dun tell me sad and sappy things and make me pity you.i have the capability to, but pls dun take advantage of it and make me suffer with u.watever happens to u, pls dun drag me down later on.i dun care wat u think of this post later on,i dun care wat ppl will think of u either,if they really noe u well,they'll understand your situation, if not then too bad. watever it is, u better not die, YET. gimme my money back. then u can die all u want.i do not intend to keep contact after the money is returned.dun ask for favours,etc.leave me alone.and dun bother calling and asking me about this post. i'll just hang up on you.
there goes my plans for the day. as a perfectionist, do u noe how irritating it is when your plans fuck up? and for a long time it seemed to always been jacq's fault. cool huh? of coz u all have to take note that this is my perspective. u all are entitled to your own perspectives so dun let mine affect yours of jacq.so dun come and blame me for changing their perspective of u jacq.u can tell me all u want, your perspective/opinions doesnt count. its my blog and i will write watever the FUCK i want. I.DO.NOT.CARE. everytime i DO care, i suffer. i dun mean to be selfish, but why should i help u and suffer later when i'm not even your bf?
anyway other than that we have rachel.i was simply talking about how i think creative mp3 players and the ipod, no matter how small their physical size, or the amount of data they can hold, i feel the battery life is wat i think is the factor. coz by far, all memory/hdd-based mp3 players will have a rather short batt life span. meaning up to like 20hrs average playtime. to me, no matter how much the amount of songs u can hold,u'll have onli 20hrs of playtime before recharge. thats right. 20hrs on average ONLI. that means u wont be able to like, have an ipod on the go for a long time. which imo, sucks. why? well its rather hard to explain, i for one, would find the charging of the ipod annoying.and the amount of space available is just far too much. waste of space and money. lets look at the more cost effective solution. mp3 discmans. think sony. now thats some impressive piece of hardware. why? if ur a person who's like me, soon u'll understand. the kind of songs i listen to, can be squeezed into 1 blank cd. and with the rechargeable slim batts, and the external AA batt casing, the discman can last up to 80hrs i think? and thats on audio cd. if it played mp3, it'll last longer. which means all my fav songs on 1 disc, with shuffle on,running on both batts. now if i listen to an average of 1-2hrs a day, that would mean the discman can last me 40-80days w/o having me to change the AA batts, or recharge the slim batts. isnt that number impressive?maybe its my logic, but imo i think thats cost effective, in both space,batt efficiency, etc. and how much does my mp3 discman cost? i think it was onli $159(or was it 259, cant remember, it was present anyway). now even if it was 259, its still cheaper than most mp3 players, esp the ipod, mini or not. and based on my needs that the songs i want are able to fit into a disc, this would mean i would not need to change my disc for around 40days min, theorically that is. by far this is the most efficient thing i can think of.
apparently rachel sounded disgusted by my logic. why? she thinks i want the shuffle, etc, all done automatically with me not doing hardwork. hence i quote another eg, where in sch we should study smart, not hard. then shoots back how this year's O lvls were designed to beat those kids who study smart. ytf would anyone want to do that? its not like those who study smart are like cheating, and if u wanna study the WHOLE txtbk and memorise it, i think thats plain stupid. its not like ur gonna apply EVERYTHING u learn anyway, correct? but at the end of the conversation she seemed disgusted and disappointed with my way of thinking. am i wrong? i'm a perfectionist, which means i will find ways to efficient-cise a process, watever the process it maybe.
then later i happened to be joking with her concerning having 'heard' of a 'urban legend' concerning "hell hath no fury like a woman scorned". now, keyword here is, JOKING. of coz i've heard of such a phrase, and no i do noe it is not urban legend. she goes on to explain that women are more emotional and that piss them off and they can torture men fo eg, not giving them sex and not do anything physical at all. since i thought she was joking, i just jokingly shot back, that since i'm a snag(Sensitive New Age Guy) and a metreosexual(a hetreosexual male who bothers to take care of his looks and physique, something like that, think brazillian wax) that i'm bound to be just as emotional, which i really am. but that seemed to have annoyed her. later in the train she noticed that i was rather tired, and said that she didnt need me to send her back, but i insisted. then she said she walked alone in the red light district when she was in japan, and nothing happened to her. ok fine, no need to send her back then. and later when i wanted to hold her hand, she pulled her hand back a bit, i thought i missed and went to grab it again and she pulled it behind her. i looked and her questioningly and she gave me that "hell hath no fury like a woman scorned" look. FINE. 2 CAN PLAY THAT GAME. and about not sending u back? fine. i wont send u back anymore then. u girls think u can always take care of yourself right? go ahead then. i'll just remove that ability out of the whole package. is it so wrong to be nice and gentlemanly and send u back? u wanna play punk right? when u noe my plans already screwed for the day, u still wanna be like this. cant be bothered to say bye to her when i got off at clementi. rushed back home to pen my thoughts, right now. u can forget about me calling u tonight, coz i'm too pissed to care about anything.
there goes my plans for the day. as a perfectionist, do u noe how irritating it is when your plans fuck up? and for a long time it seemed to always been jacq's fault. cool huh? of coz u all have to take note that this is my perspective. u all are entitled to your own perspectives so dun let mine affect yours of jacq.so dun come and blame me for changing their perspective of u jacq.u can tell me all u want, your perspective/opinions doesnt count. its my blog and i will write watever the FUCK i want. I.DO.NOT.CARE. everytime i DO care, i suffer. i dun mean to be selfish, but why should i help u and suffer later when i'm not even your bf?
anyway other than that we have rachel.i was simply talking about how i think creative mp3 players and the ipod, no matter how small their physical size, or the amount of data they can hold, i feel the battery life is wat i think is the factor. coz by far, all memory/hdd-based mp3 players will have a rather short batt life span. meaning up to like 20hrs average playtime. to me, no matter how much the amount of songs u can hold,u'll have onli 20hrs of playtime before recharge. thats right. 20hrs on average ONLI. that means u wont be able to like, have an ipod on the go for a long time. which imo, sucks. why? well its rather hard to explain, i for one, would find the charging of the ipod annoying.and the amount of space available is just far too much. waste of space and money. lets look at the more cost effective solution. mp3 discmans. think sony. now thats some impressive piece of hardware. why? if ur a person who's like me, soon u'll understand. the kind of songs i listen to, can be squeezed into 1 blank cd. and with the rechargeable slim batts, and the external AA batt casing, the discman can last up to 80hrs i think? and thats on audio cd. if it played mp3, it'll last longer. which means all my fav songs on 1 disc, with shuffle on,running on both batts. now if i listen to an average of 1-2hrs a day, that would mean the discman can last me 40-80days w/o having me to change the AA batts, or recharge the slim batts. isnt that number impressive?maybe its my logic, but imo i think thats cost effective, in both space,batt efficiency, etc. and how much does my mp3 discman cost? i think it was onli $159(or was it 259, cant remember, it was present anyway). now even if it was 259, its still cheaper than most mp3 players, esp the ipod, mini or not. and based on my needs that the songs i want are able to fit into a disc, this would mean i would not need to change my disc for around 40days min, theorically that is. by far this is the most efficient thing i can think of.
apparently rachel sounded disgusted by my logic. why? she thinks i want the shuffle, etc, all done automatically with me not doing hardwork. hence i quote another eg, where in sch we should study smart, not hard. then shoots back how this year's O lvls were designed to beat those kids who study smart. ytf would anyone want to do that? its not like those who study smart are like cheating, and if u wanna study the WHOLE txtbk and memorise it, i think thats plain stupid. its not like ur gonna apply EVERYTHING u learn anyway, correct? but at the end of the conversation she seemed disgusted and disappointed with my way of thinking. am i wrong? i'm a perfectionist, which means i will find ways to efficient-cise a process, watever the process it maybe.
then later i happened to be joking with her concerning having 'heard' of a 'urban legend' concerning "hell hath no fury like a woman scorned". now, keyword here is, JOKING. of coz i've heard of such a phrase, and no i do noe it is not urban legend. she goes on to explain that women are more emotional and that piss them off and they can torture men fo eg, not giving them sex and not do anything physical at all. since i thought she was joking, i just jokingly shot back, that since i'm a snag(Sensitive New Age Guy) and a metreosexual(a hetreosexual male who bothers to take care of his looks and physique, something like that, think brazillian wax) that i'm bound to be just as emotional, which i really am. but that seemed to have annoyed her. later in the train she noticed that i was rather tired, and said that she didnt need me to send her back, but i insisted. then she said she walked alone in the red light district when she was in japan, and nothing happened to her. ok fine, no need to send her back then. and later when i wanted to hold her hand, she pulled her hand back a bit, i thought i missed and went to grab it again and she pulled it behind her. i looked and her questioningly and she gave me that "hell hath no fury like a woman scorned" look. FINE. 2 CAN PLAY THAT GAME. and about not sending u back? fine. i wont send u back anymore then. u girls think u can always take care of yourself right? go ahead then. i'll just remove that ability out of the whole package. is it so wrong to be nice and gentlemanly and send u back? u wanna play punk right? when u noe my plans already screwed for the day, u still wanna be like this. cant be bothered to say bye to her when i got off at clementi. rushed back home to pen my thoughts, right now. u can forget about me calling u tonight, coz i'm too pissed to care about anything.
posted by Fux0r3d at 11/26/2004 11:50:00 pm
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home